Guided Diffusion by Optimized Loss Functions on Relaxed Parameters for Inverse Material Design
Jens U. Kreber, Christian Wei{\ss}enfels, Joerg Stueckler

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel inverse design method using diffusion models on relaxed parameters, enabling diverse and accurate material design solutions with gradient-based optimization in complex simulation-based problems.
Contribution
It proposes a diffusion-based inverse design approach that relaxes discrete parameters into a continuous space, allowing gradient-guided sampling for material design.
Findings
Achieves <1% error in matching target bulk modulus
Generates diverse material designs in 2D and 3D
Simultaneously minimizes material density with multi-objective loss
Abstract
Inverse design problems are common in engineering and materials science. The forward direction, i.e., computing output quantities from design parameters, typically requires running a numerical simulation, such as a FEM, as an intermediate step, which is an optimization problem by itself. In many scenarios, several design parameters can lead to the same or similar output values. For such cases, multi-modal probabilistic approaches are advantageous to obtain diverse solutions. A major difficulty in inverse design stems from the structure of the design space, since discrete parameters or further constraints disallow the direct use of gradient-based optimization. To tackle this problem, we propose a novel inverse design method based on diffusion models. Our approach relaxes the original design space into a continuous grid representation, where gradients can be computed by implicit…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
The combination of an unconditional diffusion prior with implicit FEM-based loss guidance removes the need for surrogate property predictors and allows direct physics-based gradients to guide the diffusion process. Results show the framework working across different scales with simple ablations (unguided vs guided, varying diffusion steps) and an analysis of runtime. The use of bounds to validate generated samples demonstrates awareness of physical plausibility.
Weaknesses 1.Unclear positioning: The paper’s core mechanism of loss-guided diffusion is already well established through prior frameworks such as classifier-free guidance. A lot of work in engineering applications has also been done to solve inverse problems using diffusion models. The claimed novelty claimed here is the integration of FEM-based implicit gradients, but there is no direct comparison against simpler or existing alternatives (e.g., conditional or classifier-free guided diffusion,
The paper introduces an innovative, training-free guidance mechanism that uses implicit differentiation of FEM simulations, avoiding the need for surrogate models and increasing flexibility. It effectively uses a continuous parameter space to enable differentiability, while a learned prior on the microstructures ensures physical plausibility. The approach is validated with comprehensive experiments in both 2D and 3D, using diverse metrics such as relative error and material coverage. The meth
The evaluation is confined to linear elastic FEM problems and shows significantly degraded performance for targets at the extremes of the property distribution. The evaluation is missing comparisons to established inverse design baselines like genetic algorithms or topology optimization, making it difficult to contextualize the method's performance. The paper lacks a detailed analysis of computational cost, scalability with increased resolution, and the computational bottleneck of the guidance
Interesting integration of implicit differentiation through physics-based simulations with diffusion-based generative modeling. The idea of using a diffusion prior to regularize exploration of a high-dimensional, discrete design space is conceptually appealing. The experiments are carefully described, with detailed dataset generation, FEM setup, and hyperparameters. Visual results show that the method can generate multiple microstructures achieving similar effective moduli.
1. Ill-posedness motivation. The paper treats non-uniqueness in inverse design as a “difficulty,” whereas multiple feasible designs are natural and desirable. The actual problem is the non-differentiability and discreteness of the design space, not ill-posedness itself. This conceptual confusion weakens the motivation. 2. Equation (3). The “optimized loss function” derivation is standard total-derivative or adjoint sensitivity analysis used in PDE constrained optimization for decades. There is
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComposite Material Mechanics · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Machine Learning in Materials Science
