Partial desingularization up to normal-crossings in characteristic 0 and 2
Dan Abramovich, Michael Temkin

TL;DR
This paper compares the resolution of singularities preserving normal crossings in characteristic 0 and 2, showing that weighted blowups work in characteristic 0 but not in characteristic 2.
Contribution
It introduces a principle for NC-preserving resolution in characteristic 0 and classifies pinch points in characteristic 2, highlighting fundamental differences.
Findings
Weighted blowups enable NC-preserving resolution in characteristic 0.
Pinch points are classified in characteristic 2.
Weighted blowups cannot resolve pinch points in characteristic 2.
Abstract
We address the question of normal-crossings-preserving resolution of singularities (NC-preserving resolution), and compare the cases of characteristic 0 and characteristic 2. In characteristic 0, it is shown by Belotto da Silva and Bierstone arxiv:2602.09114 and W{\l}odarczyk arxiv:2602.14266 that, if one allows to introduce stack theoretic weighted blowups, any variety over a field of characteristic 0 admits a normal crossings resolution. We provide a principle that makes such results possible, Theorem 3.1.4. We further show that the coarse moduli space can be restricted to have higher pinch points (Definition 1.3.2), see Theorem 1.3.3. In contrast, in characteristic 2 we classify pinch points, and show that weighted blowups cannot lead to NC-preserving resolution of pinch points, although a pinch point is always the coarse moduli space of a NC stack (Theorem 1.4.1).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
