ResearchGym: Evaluating Language Model Agents on Real-World AI Research
Aniketh Garikaparthi, Manasi Patwardhan, Arman Cohan

TL;DR
ResearchGym is a benchmark environment for evaluating AI agents on end-to-end research tasks, revealing current limitations and occasional successes of state-of-the-art language model agents in automating scientific research.
Contribution
The paper introduces ResearchGym, a novel benchmark and environment for assessing AI agents' ability to perform autonomous scientific research tasks.
Findings
Agents improve only 6.7% over baselines in most evaluations.
Agents complete 26.5% of sub-tasks on average.
Occasional state-of-the-art performance achieved by frontier agents.
Abstract
We introduce ResearchGym, a benchmark and execution environment for evaluating AI agents on end-to-end research. To instantiate this, we repurpose five oral and spotlight papers from ICML, ICLR, and ACL. From each paper's repository, we preserve the datasets, evaluation harness, and baseline implementations but withhold the paper's proposed method. This results in five containerized task environments comprising 39 sub-tasks in total. Within each environment, agents must propose novel hypotheses, run experiments, and attempt to surpass strong human baselines on the paper's metrics. In a controlled evaluation of an agent powered by GPT-5, we observe a sharp capability--reliability gap. The agent improves over the provided baselines from the repository in just 1 of 15 evaluations (6.7%) by 11.5%, and completes only 26.5% of sub-tasks on average. We identify recurring long-horizon failure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Topic Modeling · Scientific Computing and Data Management
