Locally Adaptive Multi-Objective Learning
Jivat Neet Kaur, Isaac Gibbs, Michael I. Jordan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a locally adaptive multi-objective learning method that improves predictive performance and fairness in non-stationary environments by incorporating an adaptive online algorithm, validated on energy and fairness datasets.
Contribution
It proposes a novel approach that enhances multi-objective learning with local adaptivity, addressing distribution shifts more effectively than prior methods.
Findings
Improved predictive accuracy over distribution shifts.
Achieved unbiased subgroup predictions.
Demonstrated robustness in real-world datasets.
Abstract
We consider the general problem of learning a predictor that satisfies multiple objectives of interest simultaneously, a broad framework that captures a range of specific learning goals including calibration, regret, and multiaccuracy. We work in an online setting where the data distribution can change arbitrarily over time. Existing approaches to this problem aim to minimize the set of objectives over the entire time horizon in a worst-case sense, and in practice they do not necessarily adapt to distribution shifts. Earlier work has aimed to alleviate this problem by incorporating additional objectives that target local guarantees over contiguous subintervals. Empirical evaluation of these proposals is, however, scarce. In this article, we consider an alternative procedure that achieves local adaptivity by replacing one part of the multi-objective learning method with an adaptive…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
The paper has some merit as it attempts to initiate empirical studies on this line of work. However, I do have some concerns as noted below.
For me it is not clear what is the main contribution of the paper. The introduction says: the majority of algorithms proposed in the literature are not adaptive, but then then around lines 247 mentions strong adaptivity has been previously studied before, and the related extensions have been studied for multi-calibration. In experimental section, comparison against strong adaptivity is done, but I'd expect some more insightful resolution on why that does not work in practice as the experiment se
The proposed method appears to be an empirically advantageous one compared to prior work, naturally iterating on the original work of Lee et al. The algorithm remains clean and interpretable. Several practical tweaks, such as adding in regret constraints and using the step size heuristic from the adaptive conformal literature, appear to be fruitful at enhancing performance. Furthermore, some of the empirical findings (i.e. the faster convergence, to multi accuracy, of multiaccuracy-only approac
The proposed method, while a rigorous one and an apparent improvement over the state of the art, appears to be a somewhat modest development on the theory front. I have read the proofs (and found them to be correct), but have not found that many surprising insights. In a way, it is natural with respect to the online multiobjective framework that there are improvements of the adaptive regret style (indeed, these can just be enforced via separate constraints, ignoring the worse theoretical/empiric
1. The motivation is strong as local adaptivity under distribution shift is a meaningful and contemporary topic, especially for fairness and online prediction settings. 2. Its attempt to bring online multiobjective theory closer to empirical evaluation is welcome in a literature often dominated by proofs. 3. The paper is well-written and logically structured, with clear definitions, algorithms, and theorems that make the technical content easy to follow.
1. The main algorithm is only a minor variation of existing methods such as the exponential-weights and Fixed-Share frameworks from prior work (e.g., Lee et al., 2022; Gradu et al., 2023). The theoretical results follow known patterns without introducing new proof techniques or bounds. 2. The claimed “multi-objective” setup is misleading since all objectives depend on the same residual term. It can hardly be generalized to multi-objective setting with competing objectives. 3. The experiments a
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Data Stream Mining Techniques · Recommender Systems and Techniques
