Beyond Retractions: Forensic Scientometrics Techniques to Identify Research Misconduct, Citation Leakage, and Funding Anomalies
Leslie D. McIntosh, Alexandra Sinclair, Simon Linacre

TL;DR
This paper investigates a fabricated research network using forensic scientometric techniques to uncover research misconduct, citation leakage, and funding anomalies, highlighting the importance of advanced metrics in research integrity.
Contribution
It introduces forensic scientometric methods to detect research misconduct and anomalies in scholarly publishing, demonstrated through a case study of the Pharmakon Neuroscience Research Network.
Findings
Identification of fabricated research activities
Detection of citation leakage patterns
Uncovering funding anomalies associated with the network
Abstract
This paper presents a forensic scientometric case study of the Pharmakon Neuroscience Research Network, a fabricated research collective that operated primarily between 2019 and 2022 while embedding itself within legitimate scholarly publishing channels.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Academic integrity and plagiarism
