Configuring Agentic AI Coding Tools: An Exploratory Study
Matthias Galster, Seyedmoein Mohsenimofidi, Jai Lal Lulla, Muhammad Auwal Abubakar, Christoph Treude, Sebastian Baltes

TL;DR
This study systematically analyzes how developers configure agentic AI coding tools through various mechanisms, highlighting prevalent practices, emerging standards, and areas for future research.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical baseline of configuration mechanisms for agentic AI coding tools across numerous repositories, identifying dominant practices and standardization efforts.
Findings
Context Files are the most common configuration mechanism.
AGENTS.md is an emerging standard across tools.
Few repositories adopt advanced mechanisms like Skills and Subagents.
Abstract
Agentic AI coding tools increasingly automate software development tasks. Developers can configure these tools through versioned repository-level artifacts such as Markdown and JSON files. We present a systematic analysis of configuration mechanisms for agentic AI coding tools, covering Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini, and Codex. We identify eight configuration mechanisms spanning from static context to executable and external integrations and, in an empirical study of 2,853 GitHub repositories, examine whether and how they are adopted, with a detailed analysis of Context Files, Skills, and Subagents. First, Context Files dominate the configuration landscape and are often the sole mechanism in a repository, with AGENTSmd emerging as an interoperable standard across tools. Second, few repositories adopt advanced mechanisms such as Skills and Subagents. Skills predominantly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
