Arbor: A Framework for Reliable Navigation of Critical Conversation Flows
Lu\'is Silva, Diogo Gon\c{c}alves, Catarina Farinha, Clara Matos, Lu\'is Ungaro

TL;DR
Arbor is a modular framework that enhances the reliability and efficiency of LLM-driven decision workflows in critical domains by decomposing decision trees into node-level tasks and dynamically orchestrating model calls.
Contribution
It introduces a novel, architecture-based approach for structured decision navigation that improves accuracy, reduces latency, and lowers costs compared to monolithic prompt methods.
Findings
29.4 percentage point increase in turn accuracy
57.1% reduction in per-turn latency
14.4x decrease in per-turn cost
Abstract
Large language models struggle to maintain strict adherence to structured workflows in high-stakes domains such as healthcare triage. Monolithic approaches that encode entire decision structures within a single prompt are prone to instruction-following degradation as prompt length increases, including lost-in-the-middle effects and context window overflow. To address this gap, we present Arbor, a framework that decomposes decision tree navigation into specialized, node-level tasks. Decision trees are standardized into an edge-list representation and stored for dynamic retrieval. At runtime, a directed acyclic graph (DAG)-based orchestration mechanism iteratively retrieves only the outgoing edges of the current node, evaluates valid transitions via a dedicated LLM call, and delegates response generation to a separate inference step. The framework is agnostic to the underlying decision…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
