Diversity vs Degrees of Freedom in Gaussian Fading Channels
Mahesh Godavarti

TL;DR
This paper redefines degrees of freedom and diversity for Gaussian fading channels using geometric and information-theoretic approaches, revealing different gauge classes and a cross-gauge capacity-diversity tradeoff in noncoherent fast fading.
Contribution
It introduces geometric definitions of DOF and diversity that are gauge-invariant and develops a cross-gauge tradeoff analysis for noncoherent fading channels.
Findings
Different gauge classes for capacity and diversity growth rates.
A cross-gauge tradeoff showing capacity on log-log scale and diversity on log scale.
Extension of the approach to coherent and block fading channels.
Abstract
The standard definitions of degrees of freedom (DOF) and diversity both normalize by . When this ruler is wrong, both measurements give zero or become undefined, yet intuitively DOF and diversity ought to be channel properties, not artifacts of a normalization choice. We formalize this for Gaussian fading channels. For fixed- MIMO, DOF and diversity are both ranks of the bilinear map~ with different variables free: -covering the image of~ gives DOF on the gauge; expanding across all dimensions of the fading map gives diversity on the linear~ gauge. Covering produces logs; expansion produces linear growth; so in every model studied here the two gauges differ. These geometric definitions do not yield tradeoff curves. We bridge the gap with Bhattacharyya packing, obtaining gauge-DOF and B-diversity as workable proxies -- finite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWireless Communication Security Techniques · Random Matrices and Applications · Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
