Dual-Channel Closed Loop Supply Chain Competition: A Stackelberg--Nash Approach

TL;DR

This paper models a competitive dual-channel supply chain with manufacturers and retailers, analyzing how pricing and take-back incentives interact to optimize remanufacturing and sales under consumer behavior and market competition.

Contribution

It develops a game theoretic framework with closed-form equilibria for pricing and take-back incentives in a competitive circular supply chain setting.

Findings

Higher remanufacturing value lowers wholesale prices.

Consumer inertia reduces take-back incentives.

Market structure influences pricing and return strategies.

Abstract

In many consumer electronics and appliance markets, manufacturers sell products through competing retailers while simultaneously relying on take-back programs to recover used items for remanufacturing. Designing such programs is challenging when firms compete on prices and consumers differ in their willingness to return products. Motivated by these settings, this paper develops a game theoretic framework to analyze pricing and take-back decisions in a dual-channel closed loop supply chain (CLSC) with two competing manufacturers and two competing retailers. Manufacturers act as Stackelberg leaders, simultaneously determining wholesale prices and consumer take-back bonuses, while retailers engage in Nash competition over retail prices. The model integrates three key elements: (i) segmented linear demand with cross-price effects, (ii) deterministic product returns, and (iii) an inertia responsiveness allocation mechanism governing the distribution of returned products between manufacturers. Closed form Nash equilibria are derived for the retailer subgame, along with symmetric Stackelberg equilibria for manufacturers. We derive a feasibility threshold for take-back incentives, identifying conditions under which firms optimally offer positive bonuses to consumers. The results further demonstrate that higher remanufacturing value or return rates lead the manufacturers to lower wholesale prices in order to expand sales and capture additional return volumes, while high consumer inertia weakens incentives for active collection. Numerical experiments illustrate and reinforce the analytical results, highlighting how consumer behavior, market structure and product substitutability influence prices, bonuses, and return volumes. Overall, the study provides managerial insights for designing effective take-back programs and coordinating pricing decisions in competitive circular supply chains.