Diversities and similarities exhibited by multi-planetary systems and their architectures: II. Radii of singles and multis

TL;DR

This study compares the physical and orbital properties of single-planet and multi-planet systems, revealing similarities and differences in planet radii and distributions across different stellar types, especially after excluding hot Jupiters.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of planet radii and distributions in singles and multis, highlighting key differences and similarities across stellar types and excluding hot Jupiters.

Findings

Singles are larger than multis in F, G, K, and M stars.

FGK singles and multis have similar radius distributions after hot Jupiter removal.

An overabundance of multis at 1.4-1.6 R⊕ was identified.

Abstract

The discovered planets in apparent single-planet systems (singles) and those in systems with multiple detected planets (multis) exhibit a rich diversity of physical and orbital properties. We investigate the differences and similarities between 1730 singles and 1522 multis in a catalogue of confirmed transiting planets orbiting main-sequence stars with spectral classes ranging from late-M to late-F. After we removed the hot Jupiters, the planet types and their fractional numbers were similar for the multis and singles hosted by FGK-type stars. Furthermore, the median radii of both the singles and the multis increase with host star temperature already from late- to early-type M dwarfs and further up to F stars. Our analyses show that the singles are larger on average than the multis in our F, G, K, and M samples. However, after we excluded the hot Jupiters, the radius distributions of the singles and multis orbiting FGK stars are statistically indistinguishable, particularly at $R < 4\, R_\oplus$. In the FGK sample, we also identified an unexpected and significant overabundance of multis, compared to singles, at radii of $\approx1.4-1.6\, R_\oplus$. For the early- and late-type M samples, our work indicates that the multis are smaller on average than the singles and that the radius distributions of the multis and singles are different, except for the planets with $R < 4\, R_\oplus$ hosted by early-type M dwarfs. Nevertheless, these results for the two M samples are inconclusive because the sample sizes of 167 and 101 planets are limited. In conclusion, our analyses reveal that the singles and multis, excluding the hot Jupiters, orbiting FGK stars are overall consistent with originating from the same underlying population based on their planet types and radii. This interpretation is, however, not applicable within the region of the overabundance of multis identified in this work.