First-Order Implication-Space Semantics
Ulf Hlobil

TL;DR
This paper extends implication-space semantics to first-order logic, enabling a nonmonotonic, inferentialist framework that captures classical logic features while allowing for nonclassical inference patterns.
Contribution
It introduces a first-order implication-space semantics that maintains classical inference properties while accommodating nonmonotonic and supraclassical consequence relations.
Findings
Achieves a nonmonotonic first-order consequence relation
Preserves deduction-detachment and disjunction rules
Supports multiplicative conjunctions and counterexamples
Abstract
This paper extends implication-space semantics to include first-order quantification. Implication-space semantics has recently been introduced as an inferentialist formal semantics that can capture nonmonotonic and nontransitive material inferences. Extant versions, however, include only propositional logic. This paper extends the framework so as to recover classical first-order logic. The goal is to formulate a theory in which consequence relations can be nonmonotonic and supraclassical, while obeying the deduction-detachment theorem and disjunction simplification, while also including conjunctions that behave multiplicatively as premises and counterexamples to the usual quantifier rules. The paper explains these constraints and shows how they can be met jointly. The result is a first-order version of implication-space semantics that has all the virtues for which inferentialists and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Logic, programming, and type systems
