Comment on "Evolution Operator Can Always Be Separated into the Product of Holonomy and Dynamic Operators"
Adam Fredriksson, Erik Sj\"oqvist

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent claim in quantum mechanics, demonstrating that the assertion that quantum evolution can always be decomposed into holonomy and dynamic operators is incorrect due to logical flaws.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous critique of the previous claim, clarifying the invalidity of decomposing quantum evolution into holonomy and dynamic operators in all cases.
Findings
The claim in PRL 131, 200202 (2023) is false.
The proof of the claim relies on circular reasoning.
Quantum evolution cannot always be separated into holonomy and dynamic parts.
Abstract
We show that the claim in Ref. [PRL 131, 200202 (2023)], that the quantum time evolution always can be written as a product of a holonomy operator and a dynamic operator, is false, as it is based on a circular use of the time evolution operator.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Quantum Information and Cryptography
