Which Algorithms Can Graph Neural Networks Learn?

TL;DR

This paper develops a theoretical framework to determine when message-passing graph neural networks can learn and generalize discrete algorithms, providing formal guarantees, impossibility results, and architectural improvements.

Contribution

It introduces a general theory for GNNs to learn algorithms, identifies limitations, and proposes more expressive architectures with empirical validation.

Findings

GNNs can learn certain algorithms with formal guarantees

Standard GNNs cannot learn some tasks, but more expressive variants can

Refined analysis reduces training data needs for Bellman-Ford

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing interest in understanding neural architectures' ability to learn to execute discrete algorithms, a line of work often referred to as neural algorithmic reasoning. The goal is to integrate algorithmic reasoning capabilities into larger neural pipelines. Many such architectures are based on (message-passing) graph neural networks (MPNNs), owing to their permutation equivariance and ability to deal with sparsity and variable-sized inputs. However, existing work is either largely empirical and lacks formal guarantees or it focuses solely on expressivity, leaving open the question of when and how such architectures generalize beyond a finite training set. In this work, we propose a general theoretical framework that characterizes the sufficient conditions under which MPNNs can learn an algorithm from a training set of small instances and provably approximate its behavior on inputs of arbitrary size. Our framework applies to a broad class of algorithms, including single-source shortest paths, minimum spanning trees, and general dynamic programming problems, such as the $0$-$1$ knapsack problem. In addition, we establish impossibility results for a wide range of algorithmic tasks, showing that standard MPNNs cannot learn them, and we derive more expressive MPNN-like architectures that overcome these limitations. Finally, we refine our analysis for the Bellman-Ford algorithm, yielding a substantially smaller required training set and significantly extending the recent work of Nerem et al. [2025] by allowing for a differentiable regularization loss. Empirical results largely support our theoretical findings.