Robustness of Object Detection of Autonomous Vehicles in Adverse Weather Conditions

TL;DR

This paper introduces a method to evaluate and compare the robustness of object detection models in autonomous vehicles under adverse weather conditions using synthetic data augmentation and failure metrics.

Contribution

It proposes a novel evaluation approach employing synthetic data and AFFC to measure model robustness against adverse weather, and assesses training impacts on robustness.

Findings

Faster R-CNN achieved highest robustness with 71.9% AFFC.

YOLO variants showed lower robustness with around 43% AFFC.

Synthetic training data can improve robustness but may lead to diminishing returns.

Abstract

As self-driving technology advances toward widespread adoption, determining safe operational thresholds across varying environmental conditions becomes critical for public safety. This paper proposes a method for evaluating the robustness of object detection ML models in autonomous vehicles under adverse weather conditions. It employs data augmentation operators to generate synthetic data that simulates different severance degrees of the adverse operation conditions at progressive intensity levels to find the lowest intensity of the adverse conditions at which the object detection model fails. The robustness of the object detection model is measured by the average first failure coefficients (AFFC) over the input images in the benchmark. The paper reports an experiment with four object detection models: YOLOv5s, YOLOv11s, Faster R-CNN, and Detectron2, utilising seven data augmentation operators that simulate weather conditions fog, rain, and snow, and lighting conditions of dark, bright, flaring, and shadow. The experiment data show that the method is feasible, effective, and efficient to evaluate and compare the robustness of object detection models in various adverse operation conditions. In particular, the Faster R-CNN model achieved the highest robustness with an overall average AFFC of 71.9% over all seven adverse conditions, while YOLO variants showed the AFFC values of 43%. The method is also applied to assess the impact of model training that targets adverse operation conditions using synthetic data on model robustness. It is observed that such training can improve robustness in adverse conditions but may suffer from diminishing returns and forgetting phenomena (i.e., decline in robustness) if overtrained.