On The Stability Of $H_0$ And The Inverse Distance Ladder
B. Popovic, M. Sullivan

TL;DR
This study evaluates the inverse distance ladder method using SNe Ia and BAO data, concluding it cannot reconcile the Hubble Tension due to the minimal impact of systematics and the implausibility of required redshift evolution.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the inverse distance ladder cannot resolve the Hubble Tension, highlighting the limitations of SNe Ia measurements and the necessity of unphysical redshift-dependent effects.
Findings
Inverse distance ladder anchored to CMB yields H0 = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc.
Systematics in SNe Ia only shift H0 by less than 0.1 km/s/Mpc.
A redshift-dependent magnitude change of 0.2 mag per unit redshift is needed to match local H0 values.
Abstract
The `Inverse Distance Ladder' uses relative-distance measurements with type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), anchored to an absolute distance scale from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and the cosmic microwave background (CMB), to provide an alternative measurement technique for the local expansion rate . Using SNe Ia from the Dark Energy Survey and BAO measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, we show that the inverse distance ladder is unable to explain the Hubble Tension, anchored as it is to the CMB and its value of kms Mpc. To do so, we first show that the suite of systematics considered in cosmology analyses with SNe Ia only move the inferred by kms Mpc, and second, we investigate the scale of redshift-dependent magnitude changes necessary to change the inferred inverse distance ladder from to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
