From Guidelines to Practice: Evaluating the Reproducibility of Methods in Computational Social Science
Fakhri Momeni, Sarah Sajid, Johannes Kiesel

TL;DR
This paper systematically evaluates how documentation quality and execution environment standardization impact reproducibility in computational social science, highlighting technical and conceptual barriers and potential solutions.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the effects of curated documentation and environment standardization on reproducibility, informing platform design improvements.
Findings
Curated documentation reduces repository errors.
Standardized environments increase success rates.
AI tools assist troubleshooting effectively.
Abstract
Reproducibility remains a central challenge in computational social science, where complex workflows, evolving software ecosystems, and inconsistent documentation hinder researchers ability to re-execute published methods. This study presents a systematic evaluation of reproducibility across three conditions: uncurated documentation, curated documentation, and curated documentation paired with a preset execution environment. Using 47 usability test sessions, we combine behavioral performance indicators (success rates, task time, and error profiles) with questionnaire data and thematic analysis to identify technical and conceptual barriers to reproducibility. Curated documentation substantially reduced repository-level errors and improved users ability to interpret method outputs. Standardizing the execution environment further improved reproducibility, yielding the highest success…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management · Data Visualization and Analytics · Research Data Management Practices
