LawThinker: A Deep Research Legal Agent in Dynamic Environments
Xinyu Yang, Chenlong Deng, Tongyu Wen, Binyu Xie, Zhicheng Dou

TL;DR
LawThinker is an autonomous legal research agent that enhances reasoning accuracy and procedural compliance in dynamic judicial environments through a verification-driven, memory-augmented approach, significantly improving performance on benchmark tasks.
Contribution
It introduces LawThinker, a novel legal reasoning framework that incorporates verification after each knowledge exploration step and a memory module for improved accuracy and compliance.
Findings
24% improvement over direct reasoning on J1-EVAL
11% gain over workflow-based methods
Strong generalization on static benchmarks
Abstract
Legal reasoning requires not only correct outcomes but also procedurally compliant reasoning processes. However, existing methods lack mechanisms to verify intermediate reasoning steps, allowing errors such as inapplicable statute citations to propagate undetected through the reasoning chain. To address this, we propose LawThinker, an autonomous legal research agent that adopts an Explore-Verify-Memorize strategy for dynamic judicial environments. The core idea is to enforce verification as an atomic operation after every knowledge exploration step. A DeepVerifier module examines each retrieval result along three dimensions of knowledge accuracy, fact-law relevance, and procedural compliance, with a memory module for cross-round knowledge reuse in long-horizon tasks. Experiments on the dynamic benchmark J1-EVAL show that LawThinker achieves a 24% improvement over direct reasoning and an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Topic Modeling
