Designing and Comparing RPQ Semantics

TL;DR

This paper introduces a formal framework to categorize, compare, and analyze various semantics for regular path queries (RPQs) in property graph databases, addressing the challenge of selecting finite, user-friendly match sets.

Contribution

It formalizes properties of RPQ semantics, demonstrates their mutual exclusivity, and proposes new semantics to guide future language design.

Findings

Some properties of RPQ semantics are mutually exclusive.

Existing semantics often focus on evaluation efficiency.

New semantics are proposed to improve usability and expressiveness.

Abstract

Modern property graph database query languages such as Cypher, PGQL, GSQL, and the standard GQL draw inspiration from the formalism of regular path queries (RPQs). In order to output walks explicitly, they depart from the classical and well-studied homomorphism semantics. However, it then becomes difficult to present results to users because RPQs may match infinitely many walks. The aforementioned languages use ad-hoc criteria to select a finite subset of those matches. For instance, Cypher uses trail semantics, discarding walks with repeated edges; PGQL and GSQL use shortest walk semantics, retaining only the walks of minimal length among all matched walks; and GQL allows users to choose from several semantics. Even though there is academic research on these semantics, it focuses almost exclusively on evaluation efficiency. In an attempt to better understand, choose and design RPQ semantics, we present a framework to categorize and compare them according to other criteria. We formalize several possible properties, pertaining to the study of RPQ semantics seen as mathematical functions mapping a database and a query to a finite set of walks. We show that some properties are mutually exclusive, or cannot be met. We also give several new RPQ semantics as examples. Some of them may provide ideas for the design of new semantics for future graph database query languages.