Safe Fairness Guarantees Without Demographics in Classification: Spectral Uncertainty Set Perspective

TL;DR

This paper introduces SPECTRE, a novel fairness method for classification without demographic data, using spectral uncertainty sets to provide strong fairness guarantees and robust performance across diverse distributions.

Contribution

SPECTRE is a new spectral-based approach that constrains distribution deviations, improving fairness guarantees without requiring demographic information.

Findings

SPECTRE achieves higher fairness guarantees than state-of-the-art methods.

It maintains robust performance even without demographic data.

Theoretical bounds on worst-case errors are derived.

Abstract

As automated classification systems become increasingly prevalent, concerns have emerged over their potential to reinforce and amplify existing societal biases. In the light of this issue, many methods have been proposed to enhance the fairness guarantees of classifiers. Most of the existing interventions assume access to group information for all instances, a requirement rarely met in practice. Fairness without access to demographic information has often been approached through robust optimization techniques,which target worst-case outcomes over a set of plausible distributions known as the uncertainty set. However, their effectiveness is strongly influenced by the chosen uncertainty set. In fact, existing approaches often overemphasize outliers or overly pessimistic scenarios, compromising both overall performance and fairness. To overcome these limitations, we introduce SPECTRE, a minimax-fair method that adjusts the spectrum of a simple Fourier feature mapping and constrains the extent to which the worst-case distribution can deviate from the empirical distribution. We perform extensive experiments on the American Community Survey datasets involving 20 states. The safeness of SPECTRE comes as it provides the highest average values on fairness guarantees together with the smallest interquartile range in comparison to state-of-the-art approaches, even compared to those with access to demographic group information. In addition, we provide a theoretical analysis that derives computable bounds on the worst-case error for both individual groups and the overall population, as well as characterizes the worst-case distributions responsible for these extremal performances