Bizarre Love Triangle: Generative AI, Art, and Kitsch
Dejan Grba

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how generative AI influences art and culture, highlighting the proliferation of kitsch, expressive flaws, and the need for critical engagement to ensure responsible AI art practices.
Contribution
It identifies and discusses five types of expressive flaws in AI-generated art and emphasizes the importance of critical understanding of AI's cultural impact.
Findings
GenAI often produces kitsch and expressive flaws in art.
Normalization of AI flaws affects artistic literacy and discourse.
Critical awareness is essential for responsible AI art development.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has engrossed the mainstream culture, expanded AI's creative user base, and catalyzed economic, legal, and aesthetic issues that stir a lively public debate. Unsurprisingly, GenAI tools proliferate kitsch in the hands of amateurs and hobbyists, but various shortcomings also induce kitsch into a more ambitious, professional artists' production with GenAI. I explore them in this paper. Following the introductory outline of digital kitsch and AI art, I review GenAI artworks that manifest five interrelated types of kitsch-engendering expressive flaws: the superficial foregrounding or faulty circumvention of generative models' formal signatures, the feeble critique of AI, the mimetics, and the unacknowledged poetic similarities, all marked by an overreliance on AI as a cultural signifier. I discuss the normalization of these blunders through GenAI…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArt, Technology, and Culture · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Art History and Market Analysis
