
TL;DR
This paper explores different notions of self-encoding sets, such as introenumerable and introreducible, and introduces new methods for constructing such sets by analyzing their properties and interactions.
Contribution
It provides new results on the relationships between various self-encoding notions and introduces a novel construction method for nontrivial introenumerable and introreducible sets.
Findings
Reversal of previous results on uniformity in introenumerable sets
Construction of new nontrivial introenumerable sets
Enhanced understanding of self-encoding set properties
Abstract
Given partial information about a set, we are interested in fully recovering the original set from what is given. If a set encodes itself robustly, any partial information about the set suffices to fully recover the information about the original set. Jockusch defined a set to be introenumerable if each infinite subset of can enumerate , and this is an example of a set which encodes itself. There are several other notions capturing self-encoding differently. We say is uniformly introenumerable if each infinite subset of can uniformly enumerate , whereas is introreducible if each infinite subset of can compute . We investigate properties of various notions of self-encoding and prove new results on their interactions. Greenberg, Harrison-Trainor, Patey, and Turetsky showed that we can always find some uniformity from an introenumerable set. We show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
