A Human-Centric Framework for Data Attribution in Large Language Models

TL;DR

This paper proposes a human-centric framework for data attribution in LLMs, integrating stakeholder goals, policy, and economic factors to address data usage transparency and creator rights.

Contribution

It introduces a flexible, negotiation-based attribution framework connecting NLP methods, governance policies, and economic incentives in the data economy.

Findings

Framework allows stakeholder-specific attribution goals

Negotiation process tailors attribution to different use cases

Bridges technical, policy, and economic perspectives

Abstract

In the current Large Language Model (LLM) ecosystem, creators have little agency over how their data is used, and LLM users may find themselves unknowingly plagiarizing existing sources. Attribution of LLM-generated text to LLM input data could help with these challenges, but so far we have more questions than answers: what elements of LLM outputs require attribution, what goals should it serve, how should it be implemented? We contribute a human-centric data attribution framework, which situates the attribution problem within the broader data economy. Specific use cases for attribution, such as creative writing assistance or fact-checking, can be specified via a set of parameters (including stakeholder objectives and implementation criteria). These criteria are up for negotiation by the relevant stakeholder groups: creators, LLM users, and their intermediaries (publishers, platforms, AI companies). The outcome of domain-specific negotiations can be implemented and tested for whether the stakeholder goals are achieved. The proposed approach provides a bridge between methodological NLP work on data attribution, governance work on policy interventions, and economic analysis of creator incentives for a sustainable equilibrium in the data economy.