Learning Structure-Semantic Evolution Trajectories for Graph Domain Adaptation
Wei Chen, Xingyu Guo, Shuang Li, Yan Zhong, Zhao Zhang, Fuzhen Zhuang, Hongrui Liu, Libang Zhang, Guo Ye, Huimei He

TL;DR
This paper introduces DiffGDA, a diffusion-based method for graph domain adaptation that models continuous structural and semantic evolution, outperforming fixed-step approaches in real-world scenarios.
Contribution
It proposes a novel diffusion process using stochastic differential equations to model continuous graph evolution for domain adaptation, guided by a domain-aware network.
Findings
Outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on 14 graph transfer tasks
Models continuous structural and semantic evolution effectively
Theoretically converges to optimal domain bridging solution
Abstract
Graph Domain Adaptation (GDA) aims to bridge distribution shifts between domains by transferring knowledge from well-labeled source graphs to given unlabeled target graphs. One promising recent approach addresses graph transfer by discretizing the adaptation process, typically through the construction of intermediate graphs or stepwise alignment procedures. However, such discrete strategies often fail in real-world scenarios, where graph structures evolve continuously and nonlinearly, making it difficult for fixed-step alignment to approximate the actual transformation process. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{DiffGDA}, a \textbf{Diff}usion-based \textbf{GDA} method that models the domain adaptation process as a continuous-time generative process. We formulate the evolution from source to target graphs using stochastic differential equations (SDEs), enabling the joint…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
Graph Domain Adaptation (GDA) is a very interesting and meaningful research direction. The writing of this article is clear. The author has given proof of relevant theories and conducted a relatively comprehensive experimental design. DiffGDA’s advanced effects are worth checking out.
1. Applying the diffusion model (Diff) to the Graph scene is interesting,the author did not discuss in depth the advancement and challenges of symmetric diffusion processes, as well as the key differences with the advanced methods of Diff applied in Graph scenarios; at the same time, the difference between the diffusion model in the image/video generation field and GDA has not been deeply discussed, which makes me doubt the innovation and contribution of this paper. 2. Lack of cross-domain (inte
1. It formulates GDA as a continuous-time generative process via SDEs, unifying structural and semantic evolution. 2. It provides a theoretical proof that the process works, which gives the method a solid foundation. 3. It demonstrates consistent superiority over state-of-the-art baselines on 14 graph transfer tasks across 8 real-world datasets.
1. It models domain transfer as a continuous graph evolution process but lacks explicit interpretability or concrete tracking of graph structural changes. 2. Diffusion-based methods are generally computationally expensive, and the scalability of the proposed approach to large-scale attributed graphs (e.g., ogbn-Products) remains questionable. 3. Experiments are conducted only on homogeneous graphs, lacking evaluations on more realistic heterogeneous graphs (e.g., IMDB) to demonstrate broader a
1. The core idea of modeling GDA as a continuous, time-driven generative process is novel and compelling. It directly addresses a clear limitation of existing data-oriented methods, which often assume a discrete or linear transformation between domains. The argument that real-world graph evolution is continuous and nonlinear provides strong motivation for this diffusion-based approach. 2. The method is thoroughly evaluated against a wide array of recent GDA baselines (both model-oriented and da
1. The primary concern is the practical efficiency and scalability of the proposed method. The framework involves training multiple components: a score network $\mathbb{P}(l)$, a guidance network $\mathbb{Q}(\delta)$ (which itself relies on a pre-trained domain classifier $\mathcal{C}_{gnn}$ for density ratio estimation), and a final GNN classifier. This represents a significant increase in complexity over simpler GDA methods. The "Discussion on Computational Cost" remark and the complexity anal
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Topic Modeling
