Would a Large Language Model Pay Extra for a View? Inferring Willingness to Pay from Subjective Choices
Manon Reusens, Sofie Goethals, Toon Calders, David Martens

TL;DR
This paper investigates how large language models make subjective choices in travel scenarios, estimating their willingness to pay and comparing it to human benchmarks, revealing both potential and limitations of LLMs in decision support.
Contribution
It introduces a method to infer LLMs' willingness to pay from subjective choices and compares these estimates to human data, highlighting systematic deviations and factors affecting valuation accuracy.
Findings
Larger LLMs can produce meaningful WTP estimates.
Models tend to overestimate human WTP, especially with expensive options.
Conditioning on prior preferences improves valuation accuracy.
Abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in applications such as travel assistance and purchasing support, they are often required to make subjective choices on behalf of users in settings where no objectively correct answer exists. We study LLM decision-making in a travel-assistant context by presenting models with choice dilemmas and analyzing their responses using multinomial logit models to derive implied willingness to pay (WTP) estimates. These WTP values are subsequently compared to human benchmark values from the economics literature. In addition to a baseline setting, we examine how model behavior changes under more realistic conditions, including the provision of information about users' past choices and persona-based prompting. Our results show that while meaningful WTP values can be derived for larger LLMs, they also display systematic deviations at the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPersona Design and Applications · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · AI in Service Interactions
