Questioning the reasonableness of the quantum nonlocality debate

TL;DR

This paper critically examines the logical flaws and lack of rigor in the ongoing debate on quantum nonlocality, highlighting how dogmas and antinomies hinder rational understanding.

Contribution

It challenges the prevailing assumptions and emphasizes the need for more rigorous logical analysis in the discourse on quantum nonlocality.

Findings

Identifies logical inconsistencies in quantum nonlocality debates

Highlights the prevalence of dogmas over rational assessment

Calls for improved logical scrutiny in the field

Abstract

We critically discuss the apparent lack of logical rigor pervading the debate on quantum nonlocality. Strong convictions often prevail over rational assessment, leading to the acceptance of loose ideas that become entrenched dogmas. The lack of sound rationales and adherence to the rules of logical inference lead to widely adopted antinomies that receive little conceptual scrutiny.