MILE-RefHumEval: A Reference-Free, Multi-Independent LLM Framework for Human-Aligned Evaluation
Nalin Srun (UL, CNRS, LORIA), Parisa Rastin (UL, CNRS, LORIA), Gu\'ena\"el Cabanes (UL, CNRS, LORIA), Lydia Boudjeloud Assala (UL, CNRS, LORIA)

TL;DR
MILE-RefHumEval is a novel reference-free framework that uses independent evaluators guided by human-aligned schemas to assess LLMs, achieving high alignment with human judgments and improved efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces a flexible, scalable, and human-aligned evaluation framework for LLMs that does not rely on ground-truth data or evaluator coordination.
Findings
Aligns closely with human judgments
Outperforms prior evaluation methods
Reduces computational overhead
Abstract
We introduce MILE-RefHumEval, a reference-free framework for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) without ground-truth annotations or evaluator coordination. It leverages an ensemble of independently prompted evaluators guided by a human-aligned schema, supporting both discrete and continuous scoring judgement. With task-specific prompts from best candidate selection, summarization and image captioning to dialogue, MILE-RefHumEval provides flexible, interpretable, and scalable assessments. Experiments show it aligns closely with human judgments, outperforms prior methods, and reduces computational overhead, offering an efficient, robust, and human-aligned solution for real-world LLM evaluation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification
