How to Classically Verify a Quantum Cat without Killing It
Yael Tauman Kalai, Dakshita Khurana, Justin Raizes

TL;DR
This paper presents a novel classical verification protocol for quantum computation that uses only one witness copy and preserves it, relying on post-quantum assumptions and new primitives for non-destructive data handling.
Contribution
It introduces the first CVQC protocol that uses a single witness without destroying it, under the post-quantum LWE assumption, and develops new primitives for non-destructive superposition handling.
Findings
Achieves low soundness and completeness errors with one witness.
Constructs primitives for non-destructive classical data handling under LWE.
Provides a protocol that does not require multiple witness copies.
Abstract
Existing protocols for classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC) consume the prover's witness state, requiring a new witness state for each invocation. Because QMA witnesses are not generally clonable, destroying the input witness means that amplifying soundness and completeness via repetition requires many copies of the witness. Building CVQC with low soundness error that uses only *one* copy of the witness has remained an open problem so far. We resolve this problem by constructing a CVQC that uses a single copy of the QMA witness, has negligible completeness and soundness errors, and does *not* destroy its witness. The soundness of our CVQC is based on the post-quantum Learning With Errors (LWE) assumption. To obtain this result, we define and construct two primitives (under the post-quantum LWE assumption) for non-destructively handling superpositions of classical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Cryptography and Data Security · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
