Efficient Distance Pruning for Process Suffix Comparison in Prescriptive Process Monitoring
Sarra Madad (UTT, LIST3N - OPTI, QAD)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a triangle inequality-based pruning method that significantly accelerates process suffix comparison in prescriptive process monitoring without sacrificing accuracy, enabling scalable and efficient decision support.
Contribution
It presents an exact, parallelizable pruning technique leveraging optimized pivots to reduce computational costs in suffix comparison tasks.
Findings
Runtime reduced significantly with pruning
Pruning maintains comparison accuracy
Method is fully parallelizable
Abstract
Prescriptive process monitoring seeks to recommend actions that improve process outcomes by analyzing possible continuations of ongoing cases. A key obstacle is the heavy computational cost of large-scale suffix comparisons, which grows rapidly with log size. We propose an efficient retrieval method exploiting the triangle inequality: distances to a set of optimized pivots define bounds that prune redundant comparisons. This substantially reduces runtime and is fully parallelizable. Crucially, pruning is exact: the retrieved suffixes are identical to those from exhaustive comparison, thereby preserving accuracy. These results show that metric-based pruning can accelerate suffix comparison and support scalable prescriptive systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBusiness Process Modeling and Analysis · Data Quality and Management · Software System Performance and Reliability
