Assessing the validity of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation in potential models for doubly heavy hadrons
Zi-Long Man, Hao Zhou, Si-Qiang Luo, Xiang Liu

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation in potential models for doubly heavy hadrons by comparing it with Gaussian expansion method results, revealing its dependence on trial wave functions and heavy-quark mass.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation's validity and limitations in modeling doubly heavy hadrons, considering different trial wave functions.
Findings
Born-Oppenheimer results are close to Gaussian expansion for small heavy-quark masses.
Slater-type functions tend to overestimate binding energy at larger quark masses.
Gaussian-type functions underestimate binding energy due to neglecting non-adiabatic corrections.
Abstract
The Born-Oppenheimer approximation is widely used to investigate the properties of hydrogen-like systems and doubly heavy hadrons. However, the extent to which this approximation captures the features of such systems within potential models remains an open question. In this work, we adopt the results obtained with the Gaussian expansion method as a benchmark to assess the validity of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation within potential models for hadronic systems. We also investigate the dependence of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation results on the choice of trial wave functions. A comprehensive study of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is carried out by performing calculations using Slater-type functions and Gaussian-type functions as trial wave functions, and by comparing the resulting predictions with those obtained from the Gaussian expansion method. We find that the calculations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
