TL;DR
This paper presents VIRF, a neuro-symbolic framework that enhances LLM-based embodied AI planning with formal safety verification and active plan repair, achieving zero hazardous actions in safety-critical tasks.
Contribution
Introducing VIRF, a hybrid architecture combining LLMs with a formal safety ontology for verifiable, repairable planning in embodied AI.
Findings
VIRF achieves 0% hazardous actions in safety tasks.
VIRF attains 77.3% goal-condition rate, outperforming baselines.
Average of 1.1 correction iterations needed for safe plans.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise as planners for embodied AI, but their stochastic nature lacks formal reasoning, preventing strict safety guarantees for physical deployment. Current approaches often rely on unreliable LLMs for safety checks or simply reject unsafe plans without offering repairs. We introduce the Verifiable Iterative Refinement Framework (VIRF), a neuro-symbolic architecture that shifts the paradigm from passive safety gatekeeping to active collaboration. Our core contribution is a tutor-apprentice dialogue where a deterministic Logic Tutor, grounded in a formal safety ontology, provides causal and pedagogical feedback to an LLM planner. This enables intelligent plan repairs rather than mere avoidance. We also introduce a scalable knowledge acquisition pipeline that synthesizes safety knowledge bases from real-world documents, correcting blind spots in existing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
