Learning from Literature: Integrating LLMs and Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Oncology Trial Design

TL;DR

This paper introduces LEAD-ONC, an AI framework combining large language models and Bayesian modeling to synthesize literature evidence for designing more accurate and efficient oncology trials.

Contribution

The paper presents a novel AI-assisted framework that extracts and reconstructs clinical trial data from literature to inform oncology trial design.

Findings

Successfully applied to five lung cancer trials

Identified three patient populations based on baseline characteristics

Projected survival benefits with probabilistic estimates

Abstract

Designing modern oncology trials requires synthesizing evidence from prior studies to inform hypothesis generation and sample size determination. Trial designs based on incomplete or imprecise summaries can lead to misspecified hypotheses and underpowered studies, resulting in false positive or negative conclusions. To address this challenge, we developed LEAD-ONC (Literature to Evidence for Analytics and Design in Oncology), an AI-assisted framework that transforms published clinical trial reports into quantitative, design-relevant evidence. Given expert-curated trial publications that meet prespecified eligibility criteria, LEAD-ONC uses large language models to extract baseline characteristics and reconstruct individual patient data from Kaplan-Meier curves, followed by Bayesian hierarchical modeling to generate predictive survival distributions for a prespecified target trial population. We demonstrate the framework using five phase III trials in first-line non-small-cell lung cancer evaluating PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors with or without CTLA-4 blockade. Clustering based on baseline characteristics identified three clinically interpretable populations defined by histology. For a prospective randomized trial in the mixed-histology population comparing mono versus dual immune checkpoint inhibition, LEAD-ONC projected a modest median overall survival difference of 2.8 months (95 percent credible interval -2.0 to 7.6) and an estimated probability of at least a 3-month benefit of approximately 0.45. As LEAD-ONC remains under active development, these results are intended as preliminary demonstrations of the frameworks potential to support evidence-driven oncology trial design rather than definitive clinical conclusions.