Thinking Makes LLM Agents Introverted: How Mandatory Thinking Can Backfire in User-Engaged Agents
Jiatong Li, Changdae Oh, Hyeong Kyu Choi, Jindong Wang, Sharon Li

TL;DR
This study reveals that mandatory reasoning in user-engaged LLM agents can backfire by reducing information sharing, leading to performance drops, but explicit prompts for transparency can improve outcomes.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis showing that explicit thinking can hinder user-agent interactions, and highlights the importance of proactive transparency for optimizing LLM agents.
Findings
Mandatory thinking often degrades agent performance in user scenarios.
Thinking causes agents to be more introverted, reducing information disclosure.
Explicit prompts for transparency improve agent performance.
Abstract
Eliciting reasoning has emerged as a powerful technique for improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) on complex tasks by inducing thinking. However, their effectiveness in realistic user-engaged agent scenarios remains unclear. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study on the effect of explicit thinking in user-engaged LLM agents. Our experiments span across seven models, three benchmarks, and two thinking instantiations, and we evaluate them through both a quantitative response taxonomy analysis and qualitative failure propagation case studies. Contrary to expectations, we find that mandatory thinking often backfires on agents in user-engaged settings, causing anomalous performance degradation across various LLMs. Our key finding reveals that thinking makes agents more ``introverted'' by shortening responses and reducing information disclosure to users, which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
