Robust Multiagent Collaboration Through Weighted Max-Min T-Joins
Sharareh Alipour

TL;DR
This paper introduces algorithms for the weighted max-min T-join problem, providing approximation guarantees and bounds, with practical evaluation demonstrating their effectiveness in multiagent collaboration scenarios.
Contribution
It develops new algorithms and bounds for the weighted max-min T-join problem, including a 2 ln n-approximation and exact solutions for specific weights, advancing robust multiagent group formation.
Findings
Algorithms achieve small constant-factor approximations in practice.
Upper and lower bounds are consistently close on real datasets.
The methods are effective for fair and robust multiagent collaboration.
Abstract
Many multiagent tasks -- such as reviewer assignment, coalition formation, or fair resource allocation -- require selecting a group of agents such that collaboration remains effective even in the worst case. The \emph{weighted max-min -join problem} formalizes this challenge by seeking a subset of vertices whose minimum-weight matching is maximized, thereby ensuring robust outcomes against unfavorable pairings. We advance the study of this problem in several directions. First, we design an algorithm that computes an upper bound for the \emph{weighted max-min -matching problem}, where the chosen set must contain exactly vertices. Building on this bound, we develop a general algorithm with a \emph{-approximation guarantee} that runs in time. Second, using ear decompositions, we propose another upper bound for the weighted max-min -join cost. We also show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
