Turning non-superconducting elements into superconductors by quantum confinement and proximity
Giovanni A. Ummarino, Alessio Zaccone

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether quantum confinement and proximity effects can induce superconductivity in non-superconducting metals, predicting narrow thickness windows for emergence and potential T_c enhancement in heterostructures.
Contribution
It introduces a unified theoretical framework using a confinement-generalized Eliashberg theory to predict superconductivity in ultra-thin metal films and heterostructures without adjustable parameters.
Findings
Superconductivity appears only in specific, extremely narrow thickness ranges.
Critical temperature can be significantly enhanced in superconductor/normal-metal heterostructures.
Superconductivity in good metals requires fine-tuning at sub-nanometer scales.
Abstract
Elemental good metals, including noble metals (Cu, Ag, Au) and several -block elements, do not exhibit superconductivity in bulk at ambient pressure, mainly due to weak electron-phonon coupling that cannot overcome Coulomb repulsion. Quantum confinement in ultra-thin films reshapes the electronic spectrum and the density of states near the Fermi level, producing strong, often non-monotonic, thickness dependencies of the critical temperature in established superconductors. Here, we examine whether confinement alone, or combined with proximity effects, can induce superconductivity in metals that are non-superconducting in bulk form. We review recent theoretical progress and introduce a unified framework based on a confinement-generalized, isotropic one-band Eliashberg theory, where the normal density of states becomes energy dependent and key parameters (, , \mu^)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
