Punishment in bipartite societies
Sinan Feng, Genjiu Xu, Yu Chen, Chaoqian Wang, Attila Szolnoki

TL;DR
This paper investigates how intergroup punishment in bipartite societies influences cooperation, revealing that symmetric punishment can promote stability and social welfare, especially at low punishment levels and specific game parameters.
Contribution
It introduces a novel bipartite population model with intergroup punishment, highlighting the role of symmetry in promoting cooperation and social welfare.
Findings
Symmetric intergroup punishment fosters cooperation.
Low punishment intensity enhances social welfare.
Breaking symmetry inhibits cooperation.
Abstract
From ant-acacia mutualism to performative conflict resolution among Inuit, dedicated punishments between distinct subsets of a population are widespread and can reshape the evolutionary trajectory of cooperation. Existing studies have focused on punishments within a homogeneous population, paying little attention to cooperative dynamics in a situation where belonging to a subset is equally important to the actual strategy represented by an actor. To fill this gap, we here study a bipartite population where cooperator agents in a public goods game penalize exclusively those defectors who belong to the alternative subset. We find that cooperation can emerge and remain stable under symmetric intergroup punishment. In particular, at low punishment intensity and at a small value of the enhancement factor of the dilemma game, intergroup punishment promotes cooperation more effectively than a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Language and cultural evolution
