$f$-Differential Privacy Filters: Validity and Approximate Solutions
Long Tran, Antti Koskela, Ossi R\"ais\"a, Antti Honkela

TL;DR
This paper investigates the validity of $f$-DP privacy filters under adaptive composition, demonstrating fundamental limitations, establishing a central limit theorem, and proposing an approximate GDP filter that outperforms RDP-based methods in certain regimes.
Contribution
It reveals the invalidity of the natural $f$-DP filter under full adaptivity, characterizes conditions for validity, and introduces a Gaussian approximation-based filter for subsampled mechanisms.
Findings
The natural $f$-DP filter is fundamentally invalid under full adaptivity.
A central limit theorem for $f$-DP establishes Gaussian convergence of privacy losses.
An approximate GDP filter for subsampled Gaussian mechanisms outperforms RDP in asymptotic regimes.
Abstract
Accounting for privacy loss under fully adaptive composition -- where mechanism choice and privacy parameters may depend on the history of prior outputs -- is a central challenge in differential privacy (DP). Here, privacy filters are stopping rules ensuring a prescribed global budget is not exceeded. A leading candidate for optimal filter design is -DP, which characterizes the full extent of adversarial hypothesis testing and recovers -DP through piece-wise linear trade-off functions, while enabling tight -DP accounting in standard compositions via tensor products. Yet whether such filters can be correctly defined under -DP remains unclear. We show that the natural -DP filter -- tracking path-wise accumulating tensor products and stopping when the prescribed curve is crossed -- is fundamentally invalid, precluding the direct use of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
