On Randomized Algorithms in Online Strategic Classification
Chase Hutton, Adam Melrod, and Han Shao

TL;DR
This paper explores the advantages of randomized algorithms in online strategic classification, providing new lower bounds and improved algorithms that outperform deterministic methods in both realizable and agnostic settings.
Contribution
It extends lower bounds to randomized algorithms, introduces a new randomized learner with improved bounds, and develops an optimal proper learner with tighter regret guarantees.
Findings
First lower bound for randomized learners in realizable setting.
New randomized learner improves existing upper bounds.
Proper learner achieves near-optimal regret bounds.
Abstract
Online strategic classification studies settings in which agents strategically modify their features to obtain favorable predictions. For example, given a classifier that determines loan approval based on credit scores, applicants may open or close credit cards and bank accounts to obtain a positive prediction. The learning goal is to achieve low mistake or regret bounds despite such strategic behavior. While randomized algorithms have the potential to offer advantages to the learner in strategic settings, they have been largely underexplored. In the realizable setting, no lower bound is known for randomized algorithms, and existing lower bound constructions for deterministic learners can be circumvented by randomization. In the agnostic setting, the best known regret upper bound is , which is far from the standard online learning rate of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Game Theory and Voting Systems
