Note on the treewidth of graphs excluding a disjoint union of cycles as a minor
Gwena\"el Joret, Piotr Micek

TL;DR
This paper determines the bounds on the treewidth of planar graphs that exclude a disjoint union of cycles as a minor, establishing tight bounds related to the number of cycles and vertices.
Contribution
The paper provides a tight bound on the treewidth of graphs excluding a disjoint union of cycles as minors, extending understanding of graph minors and treewidth.
Findings
f(H)=O(|V(H)| + k log k) for disjoint union of k cycles
Bound is proven to be tight
Advances the theory of graph minors and treewidth
Abstract
For a planar graph , let denote the minimum integer such that all graphs excluding as a minor have treewidth at most . We show that if is a disjoint union of cycles then , which is best possible.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Interconnection Networks and Systems
