Projected Boosting with Fairness Constraints: Quantifying the Cost of Fair Training Distributions
Amir Asiaee, Kaveh Aryan

TL;DR
This paper introduces FairBoost, a boosting algorithm that incorporates fairness constraints by projecting distributions, and quantifies the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy through theoretical bounds and empirical validation.
Contribution
FairBoost is a novel boosting method that enforces fairness constraints via distribution projection, providing theoretical analysis of the fairness-accuracy tradeoff.
Findings
Theoretical bounds relate fairness constraints to boosting convergence rates.
Experiments show competitive fairness-accuracy tradeoffs.
Stable training curves under fairness constraints.
Abstract
Boosting algorithms enjoy strong theoretical guarantees: when weak learners maintain positive edge, AdaBoost achieves geometric decrease of exponential loss. We study how to incorporate group fairness constraints into boosting while preserving analyzable training dynamics. Our approach, FairBoost, projects the ensemble-induced exponential-weights distribution onto a convex set of distributions satisfying fairness constraints (as a reweighting surrogate), then trains weak learners on this fair distribution. The key theoretical insight is that projecting the training distribution reduces the effective edge of weak learners by a quantity controlled by the KL-divergence of the projection. We prove an exponential-loss bound where the convergence rate depends on weak learner edge minus a "fairness cost" term . This directly quantifies the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
