Wikipedia and Grokipedia: A Comparison of Human and Generative Encyclopedias
Ortal Hadad, Edoardo Loru, Jacopo Nudo, Anita Bonetti, Matteo Cinelli, Walter Quattrociocchi

TL;DR
This study compares Wikipedia and Grokipedia to understand how generative AI influences content selection, rewriting, narrative structure, and framing in encyclopedic articles across various topics.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of how generative mediation affects content inclusion, rewriting patterns, editorial participation, and narrative framing in encyclopedic content.
Findings
Pages with higher visibility and controversy are more likely to be included in Grokipedia.
Rewriting is more common for pages with dense references and recent conflicts.
Narrative structures are largely consistent, with some localized framing shifts.
Abstract
We present a comparative analysis of Wikipedia and Grokipedia to examine how generative mediation alters content selection, textual rewriting, narrative structure, and evaluative framing in encyclopedic content. We model page inclusion in Grokipedia as a function of Wikipedia page popularity, density of reference, and recent editorial activity. Inclusion is non-uniform: pages with higher visibility and greater editorial conflict in Wikipedia are more likely to appear in Grokipedia. For included pages, we distinguish between verbatim reproduction and generative rewriting. Rewriting is more frequent for pages with higher reference density and recent controversy, while highly popular pages are more often reproduced without modification. We compare editing activity across the two platforms and estimate page complexity using a fitness-complexity framework to assess whether generative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWikis in Education and Collaboration · Digital Humanities and Scholarship · Topic Modeling
