Towards a Science of Collective AI: LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Need a Transition from Blind Trial-and-Error to Rigorous Science
Jingru Fan, Dewen Liu, Yufan Dang, Huatao Li, Yuheng Wang, Wei Liu, Feiyu Duan, Xuanwen Ding, Shu Yao, Lin Wu, Ruijie Shi, Wai-Shing Leung, Yuan Cheng, Zhongyu Wei, Cheng Yang, Chen Qian, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a scientific framework for Multi-Agent Systems with Large Language Models, emphasizing structured metrics and factor attribution to replace trial-and-error approaches and enable systematic progress.
Contribution
It introduces a unified collaboration gain metric and a factor attribution paradigm, along with a systematic MAS factor library, to establish a rigorous scientific methodology.
Findings
Proposes the collaboration gain metric ($\Gamma$) as a standard for intrinsic collaboration evaluation.
Develops a factor attribution paradigm to identify key factors driving collaboration.
Constructs a systematic MAS factor library to structure the design space.
Abstract
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly extended the capabilities of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS), demonstrating significant effectiveness across a wide range of complex and open-ended domains. However, despite this rapid progress, the field still relies heavily on empirical trial-and-error. It lacks a unified and principled scientific framework necessary for systematic optimization and improvement. This bottleneck stems from the ambiguity of attribution: first, the absence of a structured taxonomy of factors leaves researchers restricted to unguided adjustments; second, the lack of a unified metric fails to distinguish genuine collaboration gain from mere resource accumulation. In this paper, we advocate for a transition to design science through an integrated framework. We advocate to establish the collaboration gain metric () as the scientific standard…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Language and cultural evolution
