Extreme Weather Nowcasting via Local Precipitation Pattern Prediction
Changhoon Song, Teng Yuan Chang, Youngjoon Hong

TL;DR
This paper introduces exPreCast, a fast and accurate deterministic model for radar-based precipitation nowcasting, and presents a balanced radar dataset to improve generalization across normal and extreme weather events.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel deterministic framework with local attention and texture-preserving upsampling, and creates a balanced radar dataset for better real-world applicability.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
Demonstrates reliable nowcasting for both normal and extreme rainfall.
Outperforms diffusion-based models in computational efficiency.
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of extreme weather events such as heavy rainfall or storms is critical for risk management and disaster mitigation. Although high-resolution radar observations have spurred extensive research on nowcasting models, precipitation nowcasting remains particularly challenging due to pronounced spatial locality, intricate fine-scale rainfall structures, and variability in forecasting horizons. While recent diffusion-based generative ensembles show promising results, they are computationally expensive and unsuitable for real-time applications. In contrast, deterministic models are computationally efficient but remain biased toward normal rainfall. Furthermore, the benchmark datasets commonly used in prior studies are themselves skewed--either dominated by ordinary rainfall events or restricted to extreme rainfall episodes--thereby hindering general applicability in…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
Balanced new dataset: The introduction of the KMA dataset provides a valuable contribution for evaluating generalization across both normal and extreme rainfall conditions. Strong empirical performance: exPreCast achieves SOTA results across multiple benchmarks, demonstrating robustness under diverse meteorological regimes. Comprehensive experimentation: The paper includes rigorous comparisons, ablations, and qualitative visualizations that convincingly support the claims.
Lack of Discussion on FACL: The authors employ FACL in their model but provide no related discussion. FACL contributes significantly to texture generation and substantial forecast improvements[1]. For fairness, the authors should present a comparison between other models (e.g., SIMVP) with FACL and the proposed exPreCast, or alternatively, compare the performance of exPreCast trained with MSE loss against other models. Unfair Comparison Due to FACL in Different Forecast Durations: Although the
Originality: - the contributions include both the dataset and the method for precipitation forecasting aimed specifically at enhancing extreme events nowcasting. The main methodological contribution includes the upsampling described in Section 3.2 Quality: - Good performance: the experimental results (Table 1-3) show consistently good performance. Clarity: - the description of the work looks clear and easy to follow, and I believe the description is correct. Significance: - while the o
Significance and originality: - I can see there are two important points which are in advantage for the significance of the paper: (1) proposition of the Cubic Dual Upsample Block (2) dataset. Saying that, however, while the Cubic Dual Upsample Block is justified empirically in the ablation studies, it does not justify why it happens. Perhaps, one could create a link in the appendix, offering the analysis why this might lead to the improvements (if it follows from the existing literature such as
1. ExPreCast constructs a balanced KMA dataset containing both ordinary and extreme precipitation, addressing the imbalance of existing datasets, and providing more comprehensive data support for evaluating model generalization. 2. ExPreCast integrates the CDU decoder and TE block, enabling the model to perform well in both 1-hour short-term and 6-hour long-term forecasts.
1. This work lacks a comparison with GAN-based methods, and adding such a comparison can provide a more complete assessment of exPreCast’s performance. 2. This work would be better to include verification related to the impact of the TE block in the ablation study section to quantify the effect of the TE block on balancing the detail preservation of short-term forecasts and the dynamic stability of long-term forecasts. 3. Relying on CSI as an indicator may not fully judge the quality of precipi
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis · Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations · Flood Risk Assessment and Management
