Evolving scientific collaboration among EU member states, candidate countries and global partners: 2000-2024
Myroslava Hladchenko

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of scientific collaboration among EU countries, candidate nations, and global partners from 2000 to 2024, highlighting increasing integration within Europe and with global partners, influenced by EU policies and geopolitical factors.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of collaboration patterns across different European groups and global partners, emphasizing the impact of EU funding cycles and geopolitical events.
Findings
EU-14 countries form the core of collaboration networks.
EU-13 countries show moderate intra-group and EU-14 collaboration.
Collaboration peaks align with EU Framework Programmes like Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe.
Abstract
This study explores how EU integration, globalisation, and geopolitical disruptions have influenced scientific collaboration among European countries at different stages of EU membership. Specifically, it distinguishes between the EU-14, the EU-13, that joined the EU in 2004 or later, and EU candidate countries. Using Scopus article, the study analyses Relative Intensity of Collaboration (RIC) among EU member state, candidate countries and China, Latin America, the UK, the USA and Russia. Findings indicate increasing integration within European groups and with global partners, yet persistent hierarchical structures remain. EU-14 countries form the core of the network, exhibiting stable and cohesive collaboration, including with the UK despite Brexit. EU-13 countries occupy an intermediate position, showing moderate collaboration with EU-14 but stronger collaboration within their own…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInternational Science and Diplomacy · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
