Comparative Insights on Adversarial Machine Learning from Industry and Academia: A User-Study Approach
Vishruti Kakkad (1), Paul Chung (2), Hanan Hibshi (1, 3), Maverick Woo (1) ((1) Carnegie Mellon University, (2) University of California, San Diego, (3) King Abdulaziz University)

TL;DR
This paper explores industry and academic perspectives on adversarial machine learning through surveys and challenges, highlighting the importance of security education in ML curricula.
Contribution
It presents two studies: an industry survey linking cybersecurity education to AML concerns, and a student engagement assessment using CTF challenges with NLP and Generative AI.
Findings
Cybersecurity education correlates with AML threat concern.
CTF challenges effectively engage students in AML topics.
Participants recommend integrating security into ML education.
Abstract
An exponential growth of Machine Learning and its Generative AI applications brings with it significant security challenges, often referred to as Adversarial Machine Learning (AML). In this paper, we conducted two comprehensive studies to explore the perspectives of industry professionals and students on different AML vulnerabilities and their educational strategies. In our first study, we conducted an online survey with professionals revealing a notable correlation between cybersecurity education and concern for AML threats. For our second study, we developed two CTF challenges that implement Natural Language Processing and Generative AI concepts and demonstrate a poisoning attack on the training data set. The effectiveness of these challenges was evaluated by surveying undergraduate and graduate students at Carnegie Mellon University, finding that a CTF-based approach effectively…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
