Journey to the Centre of Cluster: Harnessing Interior Nodes for A/B Testing under Network Interference
Qianyi Chen, Anpeng Wu, Bo Li, Lu Deng, Yong Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new estimator for network-based A/B testing that leverages interior nodes to reduce variance and uses a counterfactual predictor to correct bias, improving accuracy under network interference.
Contribution
The paper proposes the mean-in-interior (MII) estimator and its augmentation with a counterfactual predictor, offering a novel, variance-reducing approach for network interference scenarios.
Findings
The interior nodes constitute most of the post-trimming subpopulation.
Augmented MII estimator significantly reduces bias and variance.
Simulation studies show superior performance of the proposed method.
Abstract
A/B testing on platforms often faces challenges from network interference, where a unit's outcome depends not only on its own treatment but also on the treatments of its network neighbors. To address this, cluster-level randomization has become standard, enabling the use of network-aware estimators. These estimators typically trim the data to retain only a subset of informative units, achieving low bias under suitable conditions but often suffering from high variance. In this paper, we first demonstrate that the interior nodes - units whose neighbors all lie within the same cluster - constitute the vast majority of the post-trimming subpopulation. In light of this, we propose directly averaging over the interior nodes to construct the mean-in-interior (MII) estimator, which circumvents the delicate reweighting required by existing network-aware estimators and substantially reduces…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
1. The paper addresses the important problem of estimating the average treatment effect under network interference, which has practical significance for causal inference in many real-world applications. 2. The motivation to extend existing estimands is well-articulated, and the comparisons with prior work are thoroughly examined. 3. Viewing interior nodes as "biased labeled data" and approaching the problem from a semi-supervised learning angle is conceptually compelling. 4. The core idea is c
1. The proposed estimators rely on strong parametric assumptions, which may limit their robustness and applicability in real-world settings. Moreover, the practical implementation of these estimators could be challenging, particularly in large-scale or heterogeneous networks where model assumptions may not hold or be verifiable. 2. The impact of network interference on the proposed estimators is not thoroughly addressed. In particular, the paper does not fully analyze how varying levels or struc
- **originality**: the proposed method focusing on interior units is new and novel. - **quality**: the paper is well-written with solid theoretical results and simulations. - **clarity**: the paper is clear and well-explained assumptions - **significance**: the significance is relatively fair (see weakness part).
Although the paper provides a thorough analysis of the bias of the proposed method, the variance analysis part of the MII estimator is missing, which makes it hard to conduct a real test of the causal effects. More detailed questions are left to the questions part.
- The task of estimation of GATE in the presence of interference is practically relevant and challenging. - The proposed methods are developed based on interesting ideas. - Theorems 3.1 and 4.1 provide soundness and strength of the proposed methods. I set the Contribution score 3: good because the direction of this work looks great.
- The proof of Theorem 4.1 (Appendix B.2) uses Eq. (24), which is only introduced "to illustrate the idea behind the AMII estimator". (The statement of Theorem 4.1 does not mention this.) - I would need (at least) some more details about the Eq. (21) in the proof of Theorem 3.1 to verify the proof. - It is unclear to me what Eq. (13) is illustrating. - The AMII estimator looks like doubly robust/debiased estimators proposed in the standard treatment effect estimation literature, but there is
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
