Strategic Adaptation Under Contextual Change: Insights from a Dyadic Negotiation Testbed for AI Coaching Technologies
Mobasshira Akter Urmi, Raiyan Abdul Baten

TL;DR
This study introduces a controlled negotiation testbed to evaluate AI coaching systems' ability to adapt strategically to changing circumstances, revealing how adaptation impacts interaction dynamics and relational outcomes.
Contribution
It provides a novel, repeatable framework for assessing strategic adaptation in negotiation AI systems under controlled perturbations.
Findings
Perturbation reorganized interaction dynamics.
Distributive drift predicted worse relational experience.
Adaptation patterns were path dependent.
Abstract
Strategic adaptation -- the ability to adjust interaction behavior in response to changing constraints and leverage -- is a central goal of negotiation training and an emerging target for AI coaching systems. However, adaptation is difficult to evaluate because adaptation-relevant moments arise unpredictably in typical tasks. We study a reusable dyadic negotiation testbed that employs a controlled midstream change in one party's outside alternative as a repeatable perturbation to stress-test adaptation. In a six-round chat-based negotiation study (N=100), the perturbation reliably reorganized interaction dynamics: transitions between integrative (cooperative) and distributive (positional) behaviors declined, behavioral diversity narrowed, and interactions drifted toward more distributive tactics. Critically, this distributive drift predicted worse relational experience net of objective…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConflict Management and Negotiation · Team Dynamics and Performance · Personality Traits and Psychology
