Chaplains' Reflections on the Design and Usage of AI for Conversational Care
Joel Wester, Samuel Rhys Cox, Henning Pohl, Niels van Berkel

TL;DR
This study explores chaplains' perceptions of AI chatbots for emotional support, highlighting their limitations and guiding principles for designing AI that supports well-being in non-clinical contexts.
Contribution
It provides insights into chaplains' views on AI for pastoral care and proposes design considerations based on relational attunement for non-clinical emotional support.
Findings
Chaplains see limitations in chatbots supporting everyday well-being.
Themes of Listening, Connecting, Carrying, and Wanting are central to care.
Relational attunement informs chatbot design for non-clinical support.
Abstract
Despite growing recognition that responsible AI requires domain knowledge, current work on conversational AI primarily draws on clinical expertise that prioritises diagnosis and intervention. However, much of everyday emotional support needs occur in non-clinical contexts, and therefore requires different conversational approaches. We examine how chaplains, who guide individuals through personal crises, grief, and reflection, perceive and engage with conversational AI. We recruited eighteen chaplains to build AI chatbots. While some chaplains viewed chatbots with cautious optimism, the majority expressed limitations of chatbots' ability to support everyday well-being. Our analysis reveals how chaplains perceive their pastoral care duties and areas where AI chatbots fall short, along the themes of Listening, Connecting, Carrying, and Wanting. These themes resonate with the idea of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
