Statistical Guarantees for Reasoning Probes on Looped Boolean Circuits
Anastasis Kratsios, Giulia Livieri, A. Martina Neuman

TL;DR
This paper establishes statistical guarantees for reasoning probes on looped Boolean circuits, showing optimal generalization rates that depend on graph structure and are independent of graph size.
Contribution
The paper introduces a theoretical analysis of reasoning probes on Boolean circuits, demonstrating optimal generalization bounds using graph embeddings and optimal transport techniques.
Findings
Optimal rate of generalization error $ ilde{O}(1/ oot{N} ull)$ with high probability.
Graph structure critically influences the statistical efficiency of reasoning.
Low-distortion snowflake embedding enables size-independent guarantees.
Abstract
We study the statistical behaviour of reasoning probes in a stylized model of looped reasoning, given by Boolean circuits whose computational graph is a perfect -ary tree () and whose output is appended to the input and fed back iteratively for subsequent computation rounds. A reasoning probe has access to a sampled subset of internal computation nodes, possibly without covering the entire graph, and seeks to infer which -ary Boolean gate is executed at each queried node, representing uncertainty via a probability distribution over a fixed collection of admissible -ary gates. This partial observability induces a generalization problem, which we analyze in a realizable, transductive setting. We show that, when the reasoning probe is parameterized by a graph convolutional network (GCN)-based hypothesis class and queries nodes, the worst-case…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Error Correcting Code Techniques · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
