HybridQuestion: Human-AI Collaboration for Identifying High-Impact Research Questions
Keyu Zhao, Fengli Xu, Yong Li, Tie-Yan Liu

TL;DR
This paper presents a hybrid human-AI system for identifying impactful research questions by combining AI's data processing with human judgment, validated through predicting breakthroughs and questions across disciplines.
Contribution
It introduces a structured three-phase methodology integrating AI and human oversight to generate and select meaningful scientific questions and breakthroughs.
Findings
AI aligns well with humans on known breakthroughs
AI shows divergence in forecasting future questions
Human judgment remains essential for subjective assessments
Abstract
The "AI Scientist" paradigm is transforming scientific research by automating key stages of the research process, from idea generation to scholarly writing. This shift is expected to accelerate discovery and expand the scope of scientific inquiry. However, a key question remains unclear: can AI scientists identify meaningful research questions? While Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied successfully to task-specific ideation, their potential to conduct strategic, long-term assessments of past breakthroughs and future questions remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we explore a human-AI hybrid solution that integrates the scalable data processing capabilities of AI with the value judgment of human experts. Our methodology is structured in three phases. The first phase, AI-Accelerated Information Gathering, leverages AI's advantage in processing vast amounts of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExpert finding and Q&A systems · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Topic Modeling
