Blinded sample size re-estimation accounting for uncertainty in mid-trial estimation
Hirotada Maeda, Satoshi Hattori, Tim Friede

TL;DR
This paper introduces a refined blinded sample size re-estimation method for randomized trials that accounts for uncertainty in variance estimation, aiming to reduce the risk of underpowered studies.
Contribution
It proposes a new approach using an upper confidence limit of the variance for blinded sample size re-estimation, improving accuracy over existing methods.
Findings
Method outperforms existing approaches in simulations.
Reduces risk of underpowered studies in small samples.
Effectively maintains target power in clinical trial scenarios.
Abstract
For randomized controlled trials to be conclusive, it is important to set the target sample size accurately at the design stage. Comparing two normal populations, the sample size calculation requires specification of the variance other than the treatment effect and misspecification can lead to underpowered studies. Blinded sample size re-estimation is an approach to minimize the risk of inconclusive studies. Existing methods proposed to use the total (one-sample) variance that is estimable from blinded data without knowledge of the treatment allocation. We demonstrate that, since the expectation of this estimator is greater than or equal to the true variance, the one-sample variance approach can be regarded as providing an upper bound of the variance in blind reviews. This worst-case evaluation can likely reduce a risk of underpowered studies. However, blinded reviews of small sample…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
